The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta — Miami branch.
Home/ Industries/Regional banks
02 / 05 · Sector
Industry · 02/05

Regional banks.

Asset profiles between $10B and $100B. CCAR, DFAST, heightened standards, and an examination cadence that does not pause.

01

The sector

The bank that crossed $10B and discovered it was a different institution.

$10B is not a number — it's a regulatory regime change.

Crossing the $10 billion threshold pulls a bank into a different regulatory universe: the CFPB as a direct supervisor, heightened standards under OCC Heightened Standards or its FRB equivalent, DFAST stress testing, and an examination cadence that is no longer episodic. The institution that arrived at $10.1B is not yet the institution it needs to become to live there.

Our practice for regional banks (typically $10B–$100B in assets) is built around three transitions: building a risk and control infrastructure proportionate to the new regime, validating the models that the regime now requires (CCAR/DFAST loss forecasting, AML detection systems, AI/ML underwriting), and running an internal audit function that the audit committee can rely on as a true third line.

The pace is the hardest part. A regional bank is being examined for something somewhere on most weeks of the year. Our presence is calibrated to that — we are not the firm that arrives, leaves, and returns six months later.

02

The regulators in the room

Who reads the workpapers.

Primary federal
FRB · OCC · FDICheightened-standards regime
Consumer
CFPBdirect supervisory authority above $10B
Stress testing
DFASTannual loss forecasting cycle
Capital
Basel IIIstandardized + advanced approaches
AML
FinCENheightened scrutiny on TM, sanctions
IT / cyber
FFIEC · FRBexamination annual cadence

03

What we do for this sector

The practice areas that show up most often.

04

A representative engagement

Anonymized, but the shape is real.

Institution profile Regional bank, $24B assets, FRB-supervised, three states.
Trigger DFAST submission rejected — model documentation insufficient.
Duration 22 weeks, partner-led
Practice areas Model validation · Board reporting

From rejection to acceptance, one DFAST cycle later.

The bank's DFAST submission for loss forecasting was returned with a finding that conceptual documentation was insufficient for the FRB to assess model risk. The model itself was sound; the documentation was not. We were engaged to perform the validation that should have accompanied the original submission, document the methodology to the standard the FRB had cited, and present the results to the model risk management committee. Edgar led; the partner who validated also briefed the committee.

What the audit committee saw
FINDING 01 Conceptual soundness re-documented in 38 pages — the methodology, the alternatives considered, the data appropriateness.
FINDING 02 Backtesting and sensitivity analysis added, with monitoring thresholds for the next cycle.
FINDING 03 Subsequent submission accepted without resubmission request.

05

Adjacent sectors

Who lives next door.

Start an engagement

Bring the partners to the table.